To Boldly Go, Again…

enterprise

No bloody A, B, C or D…

So, word from CBS, parent company of Paramount that a new Star Trek series will be coming in early 2017. No details on what the focus will be of the story to be told.

As a fan of Star Trek, I guess I am intrigued as to this announcement. In the last few years there have been various fan efforts as well as the crowd sourced ones. And on the whole, the crop has not been as bad as you might think. Some of these have great production values; just as good as what came to television over the years. Some, maybe even better than a few of the Star Trek motion pictures that came out from Paramount Studios.

Yes, it has been a long time (okay, almost 50 years) since we first saw the voyages of the starship Enterprise come into our homes via the NBC network. In color, no less; selling plenty of new color television sets. And even though the show only ran 3 years in production, it spoke to people of all races and generations of a peaceful future, where mankind had outgrown the hate and war of the late 1960’s. As syndicated television grew, that message of peace and hope spread among the viewers.

So when “Star Wars” hit movie screens in 1977, Paramount gambled that it could go to the future in space with “Star Trek”. That first big screen epic may have blundered onto the screen, but it opened the door for more tales to be told from that universe.

And when Paramount looked to expand into television, a revived Star Trek television series was the anchor of that effort. Holding down the United Paramount Network or UPN, Star Trek: The Next Generation was hoped to be the successor to the throne. Instead, it got lost along the way. Occasionally, there were some good stories, but the show was more like the rest of the crowd in its day. Even with a full seven years, and then seven more for Deep Space Nine, and seven more for Voyager, let’s face it boys and girls, it was a well worn suit of bad fitting clothes by that time. Retreading stories was common place as episodes in new locations retread old material. When Enterprise came along, it truly failed to do much original story telling. And thankfully, we only had 4 seasons of it.

As much as anyone, I would love to have a future as Gene Roddenberry envisioned it. Peace and harmony among the races of this planet and others is a great goal. But as far as it goes, that can be pretty bland story telling. While we may not need to see the Seven Deadly sins on display every day, it is a long jump to imagine everyone trading in personal greed for the greater good.

Star Trek in its original form was indeed just a reimagined Western. Wagon Train To The Stars has been a good description of what it was pitched to the networks as. The idea that every week, your core cast will encounter new people and new situations has become a staple of television story telling, a kind of Love Boat way of drama.

It’s a big universe out there. Plenty of new things just waiting to be found. New friends and new enemies await. As much I have enjoyed seeing Earth and how things have gone for San Francisco, I would really enjoy seeing a new Star Trek show head off in new and bold directions. But I would like it to take up that mantle of hope and peace, for a future that fans of the Star Trek universe hold dear.

And of course, if these television shows used a bit of literary license to tell us the occasional morality play disguised in drama in space, that would be nice as well.

As a Trekker, those are the things that will get me to tune in. And, I suspect I am far from being alone, out here…

Star Wars – The Easy Way Out

image_970dba4b

 

I often find it amusing that so many people want to have Star Wars as the mythic tales of their time. Yes, with no heroes of epic proportions in the real world, one can understand how people can yearn for some in their entertainment. And why we are sadly continually disappointed when those we saw with such promise don’t always live up to expectations.

Depending on who you want to believe, the character seen above started off as just a simple farm boy who got swept up in a fight he did not understand. Kind of a stereotype, he was to win the day in his initial story. Learning from the older and wiser character as he went. And audiences get caught up in his tale along the way, right?

Had Star Wars been just a one off adventure, the character of Luke Skywalker would have been just another character in an obscure galactic adventure, as unremarkable as other who came before and after. But that was not to be and now, almost 40 years later, his story continues as part of the Star Wars series of films.

As the character grew through the sequels, I thought that George Lucas chose the easy path for him to follow. Instead of throwing him into the path of darkness and intrigue, we get the usual hero path to tread. We see him go from being just that simple farm boy, to a respected pilot in a plot line that could have come from the Battle of Britain. Where once he had been the plucky rookie pilot who save the day with a really lucky shot,  he becomes the older respected veteran squadron leader we saw in The Empire Strikes Back. And just as another legendary hero (Arthur, later King), he goes off on a journey of discovery, learning who his is and what his destiny may be. And in encountering Darth Vader, he must face adversity to prove his worth. (Yeah, I know… use the best parts of mythos when you can.)

And of course, we all remember the moment when Vader tells Luke that he is his father. As if the name didn’t telegraph that moment enough… But that moment should have been an opportunity. An opening that gave a new dimension to the telling of this tale.

What if Vader had been lying? I maintain that it would have been a darker and emotionally twisted plot point if he had lied to Luke. Taking advantage of the younger, inexperienced character. Exploiting his willingness to accept everything presented to him. That would have made Luke far more interesting as he grapples to come to terms with it or learn the truth. (And have set up a better entertaining resolution in Return of the Jedi.)

Had Luke’s father actually been more of what we were told by Obi Wan, it could have made something that was more believable for audiences. Luke had been told that his father had been a navigator on a spice freighter, but Ben told him that he was a Jedi and a pilot, having fought in the Clone Wars.

“A young Jedi named Darth Vader, who was a pupil of mine until he turned to evil, helped the Empire hunt down and destroy the Jedi Knights. He betrayed and murdered your father.”

Had that been true, we would have likely learned other answers, such as who was Luke’s mother (instead of Padme) and why she was no longer part of his life. And also have been spared the whole Leia as sister plot. As well as sparing audiences from the pap we were given later. “What I told you was correct from a certain point of view.” Talk about easy outs…

Star Trek has from time to time seen alternate realities add a bit of spice with characters in differing situations than the familiar. While I don’t expect that the Star Wars canon will do the same, I can only imagine what might have been had Lucas not chosen to head us down the path he did.

It certainly would have been something beyond the tales we got.

 

Now, there is something for the fan fiction crowd. Star Wars Meets the Multiverse!

 

 

More thoughts on Disneyland Annual Passports

DSC_0513

 

And the comments continue on the recent announcement of the increased price of a Disneyland Annual Passport. Christopher Elliot of Fortune.com chimed in with a story this morning on the controversy.

Guess who shows up as a commenting Annual Passholder? Roger Colton, of Livermore, CA.

I did not get the opportunity to speak with Christopher before the story went live, but sent him a note with some additional thoughts. And I would like to share it here –

Chris:
Thanks for the quote in your story.

A couple of points I think important about Disneyland and Annual Passes.

First, Disney created it’s own problems with the Annual Pass. In 1984, the Park faced declining attendance, especially during the LA Olympic games. Passes were first sold to members of the Magic Kingdom Club (a corporate travel benefit organized by the Disney company, offering discounts and specials). Having replaced ticket books in 1982 with the all in one ticket to the Park (covering all attractions except the shooting galleries in Frontierland and Adventureland), the company needed some way to generate more customer visits. With the Annual Passport, guests could spend an amount and have unlimited entry to the Park. Those 1984 passes cost all of $65 or the equivalent of 5 days admission with the one-price tickets (at $14 a day). If you take look at the costs today with the Signature Plus Passport at $1049, with the $99 one-day admission price at Disneyland, it now takes 10 days to equal that initial cost. However, if you factor in the Park Hopper cost ($40 upgrade), the resort parking fee of $18 a day, the merchandise and dining discounts of 20% and 15% respectively, along with the new addition of Photopass, one can come closer to that 5 days than you might think.

Second, Disneyland was never meant to be the “local hangout” that is has become. Call it the modern day equivalent of the corner pub or bar, or even a trip to the mall and you pretty much have hit the nail on the head. As a place for families to enjoy a shared experience? Yes, Disneyland is a destination. Designed to create what Walt Disney wanted and what he got. But as it matured, thanks in great part to the Annual Passports, the idea of a drop in visit or a place to gather became something one could share with more than just family. Hence the growth of social groups at the Park. And with the birth of the Internet and social media, event more folks meet with those sharing similar interests. All adding to guest numbers in the theme parks.

Third, even though Disney does not publicly release numbers of visitors or Annual Passport holders, it can be seen how they impact guest attendance numbers. A visit to Disneyland on days when there are Annual Passport blackouts,  and you can see fewer people inside the gates. But on Sunday’s when the passes are not blacked out? Yes, higher numbers of guests, making for a more crowded Disneyland.

Fourth, Disney has created a financial monster it is reluctant to slay. If you add up all of the income from Annual Passports, it is a tidy some that makes accountants and shareholders smile. Do away with passes entirely, and guest attendance numbers would probably see a dip, but the most desirable of guests would probably remain constant. That being the mythical family of 4.3, coming to Disneyland for that once in a lifetime visit. In the best of all worlds, that family stays for 3 or more days, at an on-property hotel or in one of the Good Neighbor properties nearby. They spend more per capita per visit on Disney property than the average Annual Passport holder. More on food, more on souvenirs. They part with more of their disposable income or bend the credit limit more than the Passholder. Sadly, they also get to spend more time wasted in lines thanks to the higher attendance numbers.

Disneyland is not hurting by any means. The 60th anniversary celebration has been a great success with a relatively small investment. There were no new attractions launched. A new fireworks show, a new night time parade and a revamped water show. Yet guest attendance numbers are up, as seen by more people in the Parks.

Griping about the cost of a Disneyland Annual Passport is not new. I have been on the fence as to buy one or not myself for the last few years. If not for the monthly payment plan offered to California residents, I would likely not purchase one. But I do see it as a good value. If you really want to break it down? That $1049 cost comes out to $2.87 and change per day of the year. Match that against an annual health club membership, a season snow ski pass or major sporting event season tickets. For the money Disney charges, it is hard to beat the price. You can’t even get a cup of coffee every day of the year (that’s 365 of them) at Starbucks for that $1049 price.

Will that higher price slow the numbers of folks who purchase the Annual Passport? Probably not. It may make them think more before they commit to the purchase. Should Disney look at the concept of the AP? No doubt they are. There are ways to improve it, such as demand pricing or even passes that have a limited number of days instead of the wide open calendar used now. But the end of price increases? Not by any means of the imagination. And if Disney has anything, it is imagination.

Sam Gennaway, author of the unofficial “Disneyland Story” shared this:

When the park [Disneyland] first opened, each guest bought a general admission ticket at the main gate and individual tickets for each attraction. The constant reaching into the pocket gave many families the impression that Disneyland was an expensive place to visit. When an Associated Press reporter criticized the park, Walt angrily replied, “We have to charge what we do because this Park cost a lot to build and maintain. I have no government subsidy. The public is my subsidy.” He added, “I mortgaged everything I own and put it in jeopardy for this Park. Commercial? How have I stayed in business all my life? The critics must know a newspaper exists on advertising. They’re crazy!” Walt reminded the press, “We have a lot of free things in the Park. No other place has as high a quality. I stand here in the Park and talk to people. It’s a most gratifying thing. All I’ve got from the public is thank-yous.”

The Disneyland Story: The Unofficial Guide to the Evolution of Walt Disney’s Dream – Sam Gennawey

Thanks and feel free to use any of this in a follow-up story on the subject. Or call me to discuss any points or further questions you may have.
Roger Colton

 

Why Not Explore A New Destination?

DSC_0021

 

It is a fair question.

If the price of a vacation to a Disney theme park is so extreme and beyond your economic reach, why not look for a new destination?

Sure, Walt Disney wanted to create a place where a family members could enjoy an experience together. No discussion. He succeeded in doing just that. But, plenty of families did experience vacations together before Disneyland ever opened its gates. And plenty of families do that together today. All without visiting a Disney theme park.

Think about it for a bit. Add up those costs just to get to Anaheim or Orlando. Planes, trains or automobiles. Could you spend the same amounts going to another destination? How about taking in some of the scenic wonders that America has to offer instead of another theme park vacation? Take in the views at Yosemite Valley, the Grand Canyon or track up the Blue Ridge Mountains, to name a few.

The same goes for booking at an on-property or Good Neighbor hotel/motel. With all of the travel consolidator websites to choose from, I will place an even money bet that you can spend less staying somewhere else and have just as enjoyable a time, whether it is only the two of you or that mythical family of 4.3.

And no bet at all, you can surely find some great places to take in all kinds of meals for less than you might spend on theme park food. And better while you are at it. Enjoy some real BBQ of what ever flavor appeals to to, take in some real Tex-Mex delights or even a cooked to order burger and fries instead of something from under the heat lamps.

My point? A Disney theme park vacation or even a long weekend is not the beginning or the ending of choices for what you spend that disposable income on. Try on something new. Get out there and see what lies beyond that next curve instead of what may come at those familiar exits along Interstates 4 or 5. Who knows? You might find something the whole family enjoys as much or more than another visit to the Mouse?

 

Yes, I know. I am a heretic. Warm up those fires and stakes.

Disneyland Annual Passports – Crossing the $1000 Price

DSC_0657

 

So, it has finally happened. A Disneyland Annual Passport is being offered at a cost of more than $1000.

It has been said that timing is everything. In this case, is anyone really surprised? Given that Disneyland continues to attract record numbers of guests, even with a minimal investment into new infrastructure for the Park, you should not be. Disney is only doing one of those things it does best. Taking advantage of visitor demand.

You can argue that the Annual Pass is either the best thing Disney every came up with or the worst. At one level, the company manages a large float of cash that they don’t have to work for every day. Even with monthly payments for California residents, you can’t deny that the boost on a monthly basis of income looks good to those Accountanteers.

The company also knows it has created some of its own troubles with having too many Annual Passes. The person who visits the parks more often is less likely to spend the same per capita per visit than an ordinary guest. Less on souvenirs or even food and beverage. And those local guests can add up causing over crowding for high demand days such as the Christmas/New Years holidays. One need look no further than special events where the parks were open for an extended period. Locals flooded the parks around the clock, over flowing parking lots and more.

It has been said that Disney could do away with Annual Passports entirely and would still manage to draw record attendance from guests. It might hurt for a few financial quarters as that cash flow eventually stopped but it would not be the end of all things theme park. Enough folks would still pay the admission price just to be at Disneyland.

So, what’s the scoop on the high priced Annual Passports? Here is the official Disneyland web page link. Disney will be continuing to offer the passes, albeit with a twist on the previous offerings.

The newly renamed Annual Pass (The Disney Signature Plus Passport) will now cost $1049 per person. Disney has added an extra value to the pass by adding the PhotoPass Service. It also includes resort parking as well as continuing the discount for dining (up to 15% at some locations) as well as 20% for merchandise purchases. And of course, it has no blackout days.

Yet, that may not be the best value, in my opinion. The next option down the ladder at $849 is the Disney Signature Passport. This offers all the same values as the higher cost pass with a seasonal blackout from Saturday, December 19th through Saturday, January 2nd. If you can skip visiting during this extremely high demand period, you manage to save $200 on the cost of that pass.

Having spent a number of New Years Eve’s at Disneyland in the 1990’s, it was cold and overcrowded. There were some fun and memorable times to be sure, but I can skip those now. Saving that $200? Might just be worth it.

Finally, Disney offers the Disney Deluxe Passport for $599 with a number of black-out dates, only 10% discounts for dining and merchandise. Parking is not included.

And don’t forget, these are the prices for age 3 and up. No more Child Annual Passports.

Disney also is no longer selling the bargain Southern California Select or Southern California Passes, but they can be renewed. And the former no black out Premium Pass is also being discontinued in favor of the Signature series passes.

I think it fair to say that the Disneyland Annual Passport program has not seen its sunset yet. A twist in pricing and offers is something we AP’s have come to expect. Will this move help with overcrowding at the Park? I think we will know better next year. But I suspect that the people who want unlimited access to Disneyland will be there to pay the price, no matter where it goes.

 

 

This site is protected by Comment SPAM Wiper.